Hi Guru,
Try debugging function module VERSANDSTELLE_ERMITTELN. This is where shipping point determination happens. If delivering plant is not set in item, this function is not called. If you can stop in this function, this means shipping point customizing will be read. You can analyze from over here.
Hi ,
1.Where I need to maintain isolations in config.?
2.Significance of Equiment in TAG conditon.
Thanks in advance
Murali
Hi Liraz,
there should be an option "Rebuild MPRO directly":
This should be the standard case - we didn't have to reactivate the Multis manually.
Best regards,
Michael
Thank you Rakesh. It is due to text formatting.
many thanks to all your help and thanks again Rakesh.
My answer is No and I doubt, there is a possibility for capturing material changes with change number which done through MM17 transaction. In standard, you can see this field only in the material related transactions MM01/02/04 & 06.
SP07??? - Too old!
There are a lot of issues like this in old SP's, upgrade required!
Hi All,
Objective: To group(by count) the number of vendors(belonging to custom account group), as per Age(Before 2014, 2015-2016, in 2016)
Data Source main table: LFA1; Selected fields: Date of Vendor created and Vendor Account group.
Business Rule:
Filter Criteria: Vendor Account group starts with Z*
Deficiency Criteria:
Date on which the Record Was Created. Deficiency value is defined for the Age of vendor
Calculated Field: COUNT_VENDOR_BY-AGE: Counts the no. of vendors distributed as per Age. Deficiency value are BEFORE 2014, 2015-2016, IN 2016
Conditions and Calculations:COUNT_VENDOR_BY-AGE grouping/aggregation on Date on which the Record Was Created
present Ad-hoc query report:The report gives a column which has both the deficiencies, i.e Date on which the Record Was Created and COUNT_VENDOR_BY-AGE
Required report: COUNT_VENDOR_BY-AGE
Regards
Plaban
Hi Experts
I am using SUBPERIODSOFSUPPLY keyfigure to Days of Supply.I have maintained the Lotsize policy as 1.
Still its not impacting the Supply planning caluculation.
Regards
Roshan
Hi,
yes, I wrote "= 1" to check explicitly if the function returns a 1 for the evaluation true case. But it is optional.
Regards,
Florian
As far as I know. you cant in the standard system
You will require Vendor liability created in their name to issue them a payment or a Payment request
En las partidas de la factura hay un campo TargetType (o TrgtType). Cuando esté vacío o con -1, es porque no se ha vinculado a ningún documento. Busca los que tengan el valor '14' y esos son los que fueron vinculados a Nota de crédito (total o parcialmente).
Saludos,
JC.
Hi Jacob,
Default way is to create few variables to get strings from the first 4 sections and concatenate them.
v_Length = Length([Dim])
v_Section1 = Substr([Dim] ; 1 ; Pos([Dim];";")-1)
v_DimforSection2 = Substr([Dim] ; Length([v_Section1])+1 ; [v_Length])
v_Section 2 = Substr([v_DimforSection2] ; 1 ; Pos([v_DimforSection2])-1)
and so on
Makes sense?
Thanks,
Mahboob Mohammed
Hi Jay,
I tried using this program, but it is not deleting any data from error stack.
When i executed the program, i got message that "there is no error request log related to DTP".( even though we have)
Do you know possible reason for this.
So, i used Tcode- se14 to delete the records from error stack table.
It got successful but i could see that the related PSA of error DTP is still showing the request IDs. but there is no data corresponding to these requests.
Do we have any way to to remove request id's also?
Or the reason for the requests still being there that - the corresponding requests are already updated to target.
Regards,
Shipra
Dear Team,
Our requirement is dash board technical monitoring for R/3 quality server in solution manager server.
We have do the following task in solution manger server for R/3 quality server.
1.RZ70 triggered from R/3 quality to solution manager.
2.Diagnosis agent and Host agent is installed successfully.
3.Manager system configuration is completed for R/3 QAS in solution with successfully.
4. Technical monitoring is completed for R/3 qas.
But we are unable to find New R/3 qas in technical monitoring .
solman_workcenter->technical monitoring ->system monitoring
Kindly advise,
Regards,
IMRAN.
Hello,
Thanks for all your answers. I create a multiple counter plan, but i have a new problem.
My cycle sets are:
first cycle set: 1 month or 250 hours (ex: with task list with 3 operations)
second cycle set: 6 months or 1000 hours. (ex: with task list with the 3 operations of the first and 2 more operations)
E did the first cycle set with 3 Repeat Factor and the second cycle set without repeat factor, but what happens if the machine after 750hours, don´t work 250 hours before 1 month? The cycle goes to the second cycle set and then it can´t do the maintenance after 1 month, but only after work the 1000 hours or after get the 6 months. Right?
What i can do to solve this? It is not posible to do only one maintenance plan?
Thanks a lot,
Tiago
Dear all,
we're just trying to set up the AIF monitoring (without field mapping) of an asynchronous WebService inbound.
The interface is entered in the interface settings. So we don't want to do a mapping, only the monitoring, there is no "SAP Data structure" entered.
The Application engine and Persistance engine are set to "Proxy".
In /AIF/ERR the message is shown but not the content of the message. The error message is:
The message payload is not available. Message No. /AIF/ENGINE_WEBSERV001
Data content of data message 1 cannot be displayed Message No. /AIF/ERROR_HANDLING181
We're working on SAPKB74009 with AIF release 702 (AIF version 3.0).
Could you please give me some advice ?
Thanks a lot,
Volker
I'm now having other issues with the statement that I was using when I add this to the statement.
Here's what I have:
{Job.Customer} <> ["PCI", "CWS"] and
({Job_Operation.Work_Center} in ["S.STATION"] and
{Job_Operation.Status} like "S") and
(({STAT.DUE DATE} <= DateAdd ("d, +40, currentdate)) or
({STAT.DUE DATE} In [Date (2016,1,1) to date (Year (DateAdd ("m", 1, CurrentDate)), Month (DateAdd ("m", 1 CurrentDate)), 11)]) and
{Job.Customer) = "NTR"))
After saving it, I update the data (which is nothing now). I look at the record selection and the sequence has changed to where line three is no longer in the parenthesis and moved to the final step in the sequence. What is causing this? BTW, it comes up with clean on the error check.
Use this.
Final=Substr([Dim1];1;Pos([Dim1];";"))+Substr(Substr([Dim1];Pos([Dim1];";")+1;Length([Dim1]));1;Pos([Dim1];";")-1)
First Part=Substr([Dim1];1;Pos([Dim1];";"))+Substr(Substr([Dim1];Pos([Dim1];";")+1;Length([Dim1]));1;Pos([Dim1];";")-1)
With this i am extracting the part upto first semi colon.
Second Part Part=Substr([Dim1];1;Pos([Dim1];";"))+Substr(Substr([Dim1];Pos([Dim1];";")+1;Length([Dim1]));1;Pos([Dim1];";")-1)
With this i am extracting the part after first semicolon to next semi colon.
Hi Beverly;
Thank you!
FYI: I have a small PB 12.6 test application I can send you if that helps. Just let me know. 
Regards ... Chris